Expressive promotes and advocates the usage of Dependency Injection/Inversion of Control (also referred to as DI — or DIC — and IoC, respectively) containers when writing your applications. These should be used for the following:
Defining application dependencies: routers, template engines, error handlers, even the
Defining middleware and related dependencies.
Application instance itself stores a container, from which it fetches
middleware when ready to dispatch it; this encourages the idea of defining
middleware-specific dependencies, and factories for ensuring they are injected.
To facilitate this and allow you as a developer to choose the container you prefer, zend-expressive typehints against PSR-11 Container, and throughout this manual, we attempt to show using a variety of containers in examples.
At this time, we document support for the following specific containers:
We recommend using fully-qualified class names whenever possible as service names, with one exception: in cases where a service provides an implementation of an interface used for typehints, use the interface name.
Following these practices encourages the following:
- Consumers have a reasonable idea of what the service should return.
- Using interface names as service names promotes re-use and substitution.
In a few cases, we define "meta" names. These are cases where there is no clear typehint to follow (e.g., most middleware only uses
callableas a typehint, or where we want to imply specific configuration is necessary (e.g., Whoops requires specific configuration to work correctly with Expressive, and thus we do not want a generic service name for it). We try to keep these to a minimum, however.